State recording law reference
Utah call recording laws
A private person may record a call if they are a participant or one participant gives prior consent. This permission excludes recording to commit a criminal or tortious act.
Last reviewed: . Free to use. No signup required.
Utah: the rule and its scope
This reference is not legal advice. The labels describe conservative recording practices. They do not determine which law applies to your call. Confirm the current law with qualified counsel, including each participant's actual location and any industry-specific rules. A phone number's area code does not establish a person's location.
Safest practice for this reference
One-party consent, subject to the statute
Who must agree
The definitions exclude the radio link between a cordless telephone handset and its base unit from both wire communication and electronic communication.
Official source: Interception of Communications Act — Offenses; lawful interception, Utah Code §§ 77-23a-4(7)(b), (10); 77-23a-11.
Exceptions and penalties
- Exceptions and limits
- The private-party consent provision does not cover interception for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act that violates state or federal law.
- Penalties and remedies
- A violation is generally a third-degree felony. A limited first-offense exception covers an unencrypted cellular radio communication recorded without a tortious, illegal or commercial purpose; that offense is a class B misdemeanor. Civil relief can include an injunction, damages, punitive damages, attorney’s fees and litigation costs.
These are summaries of the linked sources. Read the statute for definitions, exceptions, and the full conditions that apply.
Calling between Utah and another state
For an interstate call involving Utah, this reference uses the more protective practice label for the selected jurisdictions. That practice does not decide which law governs the call. Check each participant's actual location and the other state's notes before recording.
For a person not acting under color of law, the federal statute permits interception when that person is a party to the communication or one party has given prior consent. This exception does not apply when the purpose is to commit a criminal or tortious act in violation of federal or state law. It does not settle stricter state requirements.
Federal source: 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d). Compare the two states in the checker.
This reference was checked against the official 2024 U.S. Code edition. Later amendments have not been confirmed. Confirm them before relying on this reference.
A sample recording disclosure
With your permission, I would like to record this call to keep an accurate record of our conversation. Is that okay with everyone on the call?
Say this before starting the recording. Wait for an answer. If anyone declines, leave recording off. A script does not replace a review of the applicable law.
Nearby or related states
These links prioritize bordering states, then nearby states. Their consent rules, scope, exceptions, and verification status can differ.
Utah sources and review notes
Reviewed the Utah Legislature’s current official text for §§ 77-23a-3, -4, and -11. The definitions section identifies its current version as effective May 7, 2025.
Last reviewed: . Statutes and interpretations can change. Ask qualified counsel about your call, all participant locations, and recording purpose.
Related tools and guides
Frequently asked questions
Is it legal to record a conversation in Utah?
A private person may record a call if they are a participant or one participant gives prior consent. This permission excludes recording to commit a criminal or tortious act.
What is the safest recording consent practice in Utah?
One participant's consent generally meets the consent rule for a covered call. The definitions exclude the radio link between a cordless telephone handset and its base unit from both wire communication and electronic communication.
Which statute covers call recording in Utah?
Interception of Communications Act — Offenses; lawful interception, Utah Code §§ 77-23a-4(7)(b), (10); 77-23a-11.
What if a Utah call crosses state lines?
For an interstate call involving Utah, this reference uses the more protective practice label for the selected jurisdictions. That practice does not decide which law governs the call. Check each participant's actual location and the other state's notes before recording.
Keep your calling work in Attio.
Set up your calling workspace in minutes. Questions about your CRM or team? Talk to us before you start.